About UFO Religions and An Ontological Gap Between Communicating Worlds
By Giorgio Piacenza
When does a genuine UFO contact group become "religious"? I see it in terms of people dogmatically holding on to some beliefs, a leader that cannot be challenged and followers continued support of that leader.
When one opens the mind and heart (or mind-heart system) to information that is essentially real but which challenges the status quo, the meaning-making process (inclusive of self-identity, physical needs, and group dynamics) of a contact group may fall short of the expressions needed to represent the contact experience more accurately.
This may be due to the fact that human nature is currently adapted to a physical world with a higher entropy level than that of (many or most) of the NHI. Hence, the contact experience may need to be artificially sustained by the "will to believe" that produces forms of (physical and socially related) negentropy necessary for keeping the group going.
Syntropy is the tendency of matter to converge in higher states of order as time moves forward. In unorthodox physics, it depends upon retrocausal influences and is considered necessary for life and precognitive phenomena to take place. Advanced NHI may be able to perceive more of the future than us. Thus, they may be able to use more future potentials in actual causal events because their consciousnesses would also be naturally adapted to physical worlds in which de degree of syntropy is greater.
Einstein’s original energy/momentum/mass equation for Special Relativity implied the existence of retrocausal influences on real matter because it was a quadratic equation: E2 = m2 c4 + p2c2 (where E is energy, m is mass, p momentum and c the constant of the speed of light).
The square root solution has a positive and a negative solution and the negative solution implies retrocausal influences. But – unfortunately - Einstein soon dismissed the negative solution because he felt that it didn’t have physical meaning according to experience. However, it is consistent with valid physical theories such as that of John A. Wheeler’s that includes “advanced waves.”
“The relativistically invariant version of Schrödinger’s wave equation (ψ) was developed by Klein and Gordon in 1926, by introducing the energy/momentum/mass relation of Einstein’s special relativity.”
However, just like UFOs and the paranormal are dismissed, the physical meaning of the negative solution was also simply dismissed offhand.
The negative solution (-E) may relate to the paranormal, precognition, the expression of life in the physical world, and even a spiritual state of unity and confidence.
Consciously, we mostly experience the positive time-forward solution and the negative, time-backward solution seems to be detected subconsciously or by precognition and presentiment. But many physical NHI interfacing on Earth may live in alternate physical lower “densities” (also with lower inertias) in which retrocausal influences are more exteriorly visible in their outer objective quadrants and their subjective experience would – naturally - be adapted to this. Clear contact would require a form of healthy “fusion of reality densities.”
Moreover, the conscious awareness of these NHI may be able to consider and actualize more possibilities and basically experience a more fluid “extended present” in which future potentials are actual and associated with one or more possible pasts. More of what is subconscious or unconscious in us would be conscious in them.
One of the reasons for the interpretive misunderstandings may be that people contacting the energies, consciousnesses, and spacetimes of NHI (or other people) in realities that possess greater convergence or “syntropy” in linear, time-forward, cause-effect, experiential progression tend to interpret the future and possibilities as occurring soon or immediately within their experience of the present.
They would think that there are impending, momentous events (like a quick shift in dimensions) and would seek to validate this by misinterpreting scientific information (for instance that the Schumann resonance is increasing without differentiating the stable base frequency from its peaks and overtones).
This would be because – upon reintegrating themselves in our primary physical reality - they will continue to interpret more syntropic otherworldly things in linear ways adapted to a world of lesser syntropy and greater entropy. That is, a world in which future potentials do not manifest as actual causes with as much intensity as in the worlds of the “NHI” that have been contacted.
What ends up missing is a satisfactory convergence of forms of factual thinking cognition and gnosis/felt knowingness/feeling/recognition and – basically - the “will to believe” used to compensate for this scarcity is not aligned with an adequate integration of facts and feelings.
Both an excess of exterior material objectivism (exterior pattern rigidity) and an excess of “you-create-your-own-reality” subjectivism would represent distorting adaptations to a gap between primary human and NHI ontological realities and one of the main reasons why many “prime contactees” forming contact groups in our world may falter based on this. Facts and feelings must converge in a higher level of integration to better characterize or signify the worlds of (most?) NHI.
Remaining within a dichotomous insurgence against materialist skepticism of otherworldly realities, the New Age subjectivist dictum “you are what you believe” or “what you feel is the only reality that matters” delivers an incomplete attempt to bridge the entropic gap between ontologically distinct, experienced worlds.
In “UFO religions,” in order to sustain their understanding of the experience and the group going leaders end up extracting support (an expression of negentropy) from in-group and out-group supporters. This would also be coupled to their psychical and physical need to maintain internal coherence against entropy. But, unless this negentropy is converted into syntropy the group will not more authentically represent the otherworldly.
Humanity’s adequate convergence of physical and multidimensional science with spirituality/integrating universal principles/and a more comprehensive understanding of “religion” (as a more accurate convergence of objectivity with felt revelation), may evolve into a “factognosis” in which facts and knowingness - feelings cohere or match more perfectly.
We would be more clearly capable of representing worlds in which syntropy is more intense than in our (still primary) physical experiential world as we also rise to the occasion and learn to explore them consciously and at will.
Integrative epistemic reflexivity should be compatible with the rise of this (closer to nonduality) convergence of facts and knowingness or “factognosis.”
